[quote=@Dynamics] On what grounds? This is supposed to be a simulation. We can't take easy routes. Infinity is disputed. That wasn't the purpose of mentioning them. The fact is that the chances of us being the only group is so astronomically small it might as well be zero. That's exactly what I'm saying. They can't interweave among each other without collapsing. And universes don't fail, because the canon has always been that the System filters out universes that are destroyed or can't exist. We have very different concepts of Existence that we've tried to create for three years and they've not really meshed. [/quote] On what grounds for what? I haven't been. I've been actively bringing from other laws of physics recently. But they're used to similar to ours because that's what Dark preferred and they all knew him. Bleh. Right but we're the best group. :P I'm defining failed loosely for that very reason. Hence the "". You might say no life is failed or that collapsing is failed so I made it vague to fit for either. But even though they're filtered out doesn't mean they aren't there, there's countless new ones every unit of time that are there for a unit and then gone to be replaced with new ones for a unit and so on and so on. So they're still there, even though they aren't there. [quote=@Dynamics] At the same time, binary can't suddenly become quaternary, or represent other types of number systems. [/quote] But it can be converted into it, translated. Because they have the same atoms for their hardware, and so on and so on smaller and smaller. That's Code. That's the whole point to Code. If physics are binary, Code is the absolute smallest thing that makes up everything that eventually scales up to make the hardware. Remember?