[quote=@DarkwolfX37] On what grounds for what? I haven't been. I've been actively bringing from other laws of physics recently. But they're used to similar to ours because that's what Dark preferred and they all knew him. Bleh. Right but we're the best group. :P I'm defining failed loosely for that very reason. Hence the "". You might say no life is failed or that collapsing is failed so I made it vague to fit for either. But even though they're filtered out doesn't mean they aren't there, there's countless new ones every unit of time that are there for a unit and then gone to be replaced with new ones for a unit and so on and so on. So they're still there, even though they aren't there. But it can be converted into it, translated. Because they have the same atoms for their hardware, and so on and so on smaller and smaller. That's Code. That's the whole point to Code. If physics are binary, Code is the absolute smallest thing that makes up everything that eventually scales up to make the hardware. Remember? [/quote] That it corrects for transmit? I do remember. However, even code must behave in some predictable manner, or else universes could not exist.