[quote=@Isotope]
No, that was what Sigma set before I touched the OP.


And there is nothing objectively better with any date, it's just numbers.  Beyond that, I'm beginning to tire of your continual need for things to be just the way you prefer them.  Sigma said no WMD's on the OOC, you then you barge in and instead of just accepting it demand all sorts of nonsense explanations that are scarcely better than leaving it unsaid, and in my opinion are simply ridiculous.  A magic kill sat that just sees all nukes all the time?  What?  Then when I or Monkey question you we're [i]obviously[/i] being unreasonable and antagonistic for not accepting your every whim.  

I'm not the GM, I don't have the authority to tell you to do anything, but I've decided to just say it here anyway.
[/quote]???
Do you read what I post with half eye? Do you just skim over them?
Because what you accuse me with does not make much sense at all. So I am controlling the game for making a suggestion which practically every player accepted then (although then we apparently stepped back and decided not to without explicitly mentioning here). I am being ridiculous for suggesting there's a sufficiently advanced satellite network looking out for WMDs instead of just making up a poor explanation that nukes are impossible to make even though the knowledge how is kind of the basis of many advanced sciences which we're obviously using.

Pardon me if my wording is a bit sharp but your critique is quite a miss and not so much warranted.
I am deeply sorry for holding a discussion with people and actually wording my opinion. Perhaps I should remain mute and just do everything you say.