[@Dracogenius] Once again, I appreciate the response.

The only thing I will say, the idea of adding a character restriction AND order on top of the original turn order will probably not fix the problem, it will only make it worse. Because if you work that into my characters for instance, trying to limit each turn's post to one character (or whoever was posted first.) That being Eros, Erebus would need to be solely in the second post and since he was going to have a conversation with Eros in my next post. Splitting up characters in a turn order would make my conversation between the two characters literally take forever to complete. It would frankly cripple Wisp or anyone with even more characters than that. And coming up with some weird restriction like these two characters, and these two the next. Would make things unnecessarily complicated.

Also I didn't elaborate on my other idea, because I forgot and didn't feel like writing more. But I'll make it clearer. Yes, you would have to actually explain the rule, before doing it. So everyone signing up would be aware of the rule. It's usually was done for people were busy during certain days and just wanted a friend to post from them. Though I usually use it, to make people characters that drop out of the RP, make their exit or die horribly so people reading have a smoother read and not have characters that appear and never show up again. It's done to make [s]the crazy[/s] people that read others RP's to enjoy it more, as it makes it a more cohesive narrative and it gets rid of loose ends. Long going RP's tend to have, that 'one guy' dropping out midway, like so many RP's have. So letting the character being controlled and removed from the RP, instead of just letting whatever they were doing drop suddenly. Is what that idea is meant to achieve, you can't actually do it here because it wasn't apart of the rules. I'm just saying I've heard of RP's with certain rules, but I've never quite seen an enforced turn order. But like I said, I'll see how things go.