[@Sen] Well I won't disagree that is was a shitty movie, I don't like Seth Rogan movies in general.

So I assume you're saying, a bunch of people won't buy something because of negative events...

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/12/10/us/gun-sales-terrorism-obama-restrictions.html?_r=0

No, it's not a movie or a game but its exactly what I'm saying...Millions of people will buy things over shit like this...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/31/chick-fil-a-sales-2012_n_2590612.html

This kind of thing, agree with it or not (probably not) this is the type of thing I'm talking about. People trying to destroy a business only for their sales to skyrocket is not insignificant...and it does and will and can produce large numbers of people that may of not ever heard or gone there, suddenly eat at that place.

http://www.mweb.co.za/games/view/tabid/4210/article/19856/hatred-selling-more-than-witcher-3-and-gta-v-on-steam-at-the-moment.aspx

A controversy can in fact sell better than a good game, is precisely my point. Though is an example of short term effects not long term. Though that actually hasn't even been brought up.