[@Ellri]

Despite the degradation that I do not appreciate, I "compared" the two not because they are equal, but because it is an analogy. Whether or not "there is nothing wrong" with it (which is getting into an argument of morality that is not worth discussing at this point), the purpose of any analogy relies on the fact that the two concepts are not equal, and wall attacking the concept itself, you created a straw-man, not arguing against what the analogy itself presented.

[@NuttsnBolts]

Similar to my response to Ellri, that has nothing to do with what I said.