[quote=@MarsAdept]
[@SmileyJaws] In my humble opinion, I think 5 would work in terms of combat. We have two berserker like characters who will make up the front line. We have twon archers who can attack from the rear and prevent the two on the front line being flanked. One archer can adjust to augment the front line in the event the need arises. My archer can only be range but can provide some medical aid. We have a Rouge/assassin who is the most versatile person here. Dancing around the front line yet able to fall back to support from the rear. Again, I am just saying this to say it.
[/quote]

Ahah.
Actually, that's more of a grunt-tactic. As in, when you have a bunch of tanks- whether they are berserkers or shield-bearers- you've generally got a militia or more, with plenty of supporters behind.

You want many more supporters than you do tanks- the tank'll charge in, and the rest will cut away at the enemy while they're distracting, or heal their fellows.

Two warriors- berserkers, no less- isn't a very good idea. Why? They both use big weapons, they both go charging into the fray. Friendly fire is almost guaranteed, especially for literal berserkers. That, and the berserkers, out of battle, will either hate each other or love each other, because of such similar roles.

And yes, I know that one of the berserkers is changing to a bard.