Okay, [@6slyboy6], your character looks fine for the most part. You [i]do[/i] have a few things that really should be changed for him to fit into the established guidelines.
1) Please do a little proofreading (you can always edit.) While I'm not a grammar policeman, some of the stuff is slow to read because of typos. (are you using your phone to post?) I get what you are saying, but for quick reference we need it typo free and clarified. I think on important posts and character sheets this would be a really good idea.

2) Your profession doesn't match the descriptions we were going for. This is to communicate to the party what sort of stereotypes you are going to use so that nobody is stepping on the toes of anybody else and so that a GM can plan an adventure that is centered around the characters we like. Right now "that guy" and "sorcerer" are not on the list. However, I think you are meaning leader (in the form of connections or influencing people) and nuker (who uses magic to trounce his foes) Is this correct?

3) The character sacrilege troubles me. Are you meaning that you are going to freak out if your character gets killed or injured? That is the vibe that I get with your listed articles. Considering that we might bust out a game with random rolling, this takes away the standard character invulnerability that free-form normally provides. I don't want to say that you mean you are going to be pissed if your character gets hurt, but I'm not going to assume anything.