[quote=@TheWindel] That's something to ask KoL, though KoL has expressed interest in Diana defecting sides. Her not liking harm to humans can be chalked up to an interesting personality trait. [/quote] I mean, its fine if she defects, but a traitor to a cause is a traitor regardless of what 'their character is'. Gwynn would likely defect as well under differing circumstances. She probably does in fact, hate the angels somewhat overzealous ways just a tiny bit, even if she doesn't want to admit it. In fact, Gwynn deep down is honestly tired of all of the fighting. she probably like nothing more than to drink a big glass of nordic ale and spend all day butt naked in a hot tub. But more on point, what reason would she logically [i]have[/i] to defect at this point? Because she wants to protect a simple human? What reason exactly does she have to believe the human would even be harmed by the angels? [quote=@Lonewolf685] And let's not forget Suspension of Disbelief should exist to some degree here for the sake of cohesion. Angels, Demons, and Machina are re-enacting the opening of New Hope. Latitude can be afforded if we can all enjoy ourselves, all right? [/quote] NO. EVERYTHING MUST ME LOGICAL AND SERIOUS. ...but yeah, I probably really am over analyzing things just a bit. It just seems to me, that from the beginning Diana wanting to defect has given the angels a huge disadvantage in this mission since their inside operative is working against them, since it seems to be somewhat of a foregone conclusion at this point. But I suppose traitors are gonna traitor. *shrug* Also. Someone answer [@LokiLeo789] question. What's powering this ship? For you know, theoretical reasons.