[quote=@DarkwolfX37] If the bible is used to interpret itself then it nulls itself through all its contradictions. That's the whole reason apologists exist. What you define as the "most accurate" may not be the most accurate. You do realize that greek was the second language that the first portion of the NT was written in, right? Even the NT began, up until a certain point, in aramaic and hebrew. So you claiming to have the originals and then saying that they're greek doesn't really give you much credit to work off. Also, of course the GREEK word would be consistent, greek words have a lot of meanings and so do aramaic and hebrew. If even one of them matches one of them then it would use that word, even if the original intent wasn't for that. The Lucifer = Satan error came about when translating into greek, after all. [/quote] What are you even talking about? That doesn't make any sense; it means that if you don't understand something or question the meaning of a word, you just look somewhere else and see how it's used there. It's all but objectively the most accurate. They took the original and painstakingly converted it to English. While you have no evidence for this and part of it is just incorrect, I'll entertain it a bit. Most of the New Testament was written by Paul (who happened to write more books of the Bible than any other person). "Although we know from his biography and from Acts that Paul could speak Hebrew, modern scholarship suggests that Koine Greek was his first language." Citation: Frederick Fyvie Bruce (1977), Paul, Apostle of the Heart Set Free, p. 43 Dale Martin 2009. Introduction to New Testament History and Literature, lecture 14 "Paul as Missionary". Yale University. I really think you're just making this up because it sounds right to you, despite the sources saying the exact opposite. Greek has about as many meanings as English; it's really not that hard to figure out when you see how it's used. When I say "I shot an arrow from a bow," it's clear that I'm referring to a bow and arrow, not a bow tie. You also make a plethora of demonology claims on the basis of you being an expert or something, but I never see cited sources. You can't prove that there's an error when you assume that one side is correct to begin with.