[@BlackPanther][@Belle] *hugs*  I honestly think [@PrinceofSeraphs] wasn't trying to be unkind.  Minor details are fine to tweak on your own once the concept is approved, and Runic had before the timeline issue was even noticed, with Dagon.

I would like to say that pointing out a serious discrepancy between two stated pieces of information is hardly tearing a character apart -- and as Prince said, this particular minor detail has rather far-reaching effects.  As a player, it becomes difficult to write if I'm given conflicting impressions by two separate DMs, or even two different players.  Casual vs advanced makes no difference in this case.  I'm really not sure what we're expected to do if bringing up a plot hole is considered tearing things apart.  There needs to be a way to resolve something like this.  

I think waiting for [@LadyRunic] to address when the Moots are would be best.  Honestly, there's been several different accounts and if you're not reading carefully, those mentions are easy to miss.  ...And I would have been fine with someone telling me that Sini's statement that "every year" she says the same thing about the Moot was inaccurate, regardless of who it came from.  If I screw up a detail, please let me know so I can sort it out.  That's all I'm ever going after, is sorting things out.  -.-