[quote=@Halo]
Not that I'm well versed, but the way I see it, the problem with anarchy is a lack of infrastructure. It's unsustainable on the large scale. You can have a town or a city be anarchist, but at the level of a state or country it starts to fall apart - at least in the modern day, with modern requirements such as internet, power grids, decently quick long-distance travel, and so on and so forth. 

You need co-operation on a huge scale in order to maintain these things, and that's extremely difficult in an anarchist society. Indeed, that's sort of why we ended up forming democracies in the first place. So unless you're going to massively technologically downgrade your life, anarchy is somewhat untenable.

(As I said, I'm not well-versed in this, so if anyone wants to correct me please do <3)
[/quote]

The way I see it, anarchy isn't only unsustainable but unachievable too. And that's an important part of it in a way. We live in a society that leans towards governmental control, anarchists don't necessarily have to completely restructure society. They just have to ask the right questions to balance out the orthodoxy. At least that's my thoughts on the Noam Chomsky breed of anarchy, that asks societal institutions to justify themselves.