[quote=@Dynamo Frokane]What like all that false rape claim 'proof' you did in your anti-feminist thread a while back? I think I still have the link. 

Or when you said you didnt need solid proof because of a 'gut feeling' about national rape accusation statistics? Sounds pretty uninformed to me. [/quote]

None of these things make you right now. They may have made you right in the past. 

[quote=@Dynamo Frokane]The suggestions for the leaders in the original post, all require some level of spending, instead of an email just asking for these things to happen why cant we 'vote with our wallets' and support businesses and organisations that are pushing the said industries if you believe thats what the world needs.[/quote]

Something Catchamber already touched upon had you bothered to read the actual thread. An argument as to why this particular subject doesn't necessarily need a free market to function. Could work totally in a non-free market. In fact, I believe it would work slightly better.

[quote=@Dynamo Frokane]Can you mount some sort of argument against the free market? Or do you have absolutely no opinion on it either way? If thats the case then simply dont respond, because that adds even less to the conversation just to get your abstract observation in.[/quote]

You're awfully dense, you know that? 'Please refute the free market, because it's a theory somehow that can be disproven.' It doesn't work that way. It's an existing process that exists. What do you want me to say. 'No, free markets do not exist!' 

Now if you were asking for reasons as to why I believe the free market cannot always be used in every single context just because you're a pseudo-intellectual with a liking for economics, then I could give you one. But you didn't. 

But that wasn't really even the part that I found horrendously stupid - it was your failed attempt at calling us armchair revolutionaries despite the fact that more or less everyone disagreed with the OP so far in smaller or larger amounts. Again, something you would've known had you taken the time to read the thread (also read: you're an idiot that tells us we spew things without researching it, but at the same time don't read an entire thread and merely assume things. Also, I don't really buy into Molyneux videos.)

Now, even that could be forgiven, if it weren't for the fact that you tried to call us illiterate while also misspelling the word illiterate. Now, that, I found highly amusing and ironic.