Why would I respond to the "other seven" posts (nice math BTW; 8+[b]13[/b]=21) when:

1. You've already used the exact same slimy tactics on those people
2. They've already grown frustrated with your slimy tactics, and abandoned the discussion
3. They have nothing to do with my point at the time, which was that if I can only trust 60% of what you say on average, you don't deserve for your opponent to put actual effort into refuting you
4. Most of those posts addressed things I never cared to argue about (I never feigned at trying to dismantle your every point; only the most egregious of them)
5. You've not had the courtesy to respond to anyone [i]else's[/i] arguments yourself as a singular, cohesive whole, unless their posts are extremely short and usually just one paragraph per

?

Are you [i]pretending[/i] to be daft, or do you seriously have no idea how to follow a train of thought through more than two steps? In addition to your ideas to save the planet being unfit for the real world, you don't even know how a proper debate is realized. Simultaneously you manage to hold delusional opinions [i]and[/i] argue them fallaciously.

Keep up the rhetorical questions to imply I don't know really simple things, though. At least the desperation is entertaining, if nothing else.