Alright, been a long week and work's had me by the balls. 

Let's start with the CSs.

[@Weird Tales]

Err... no, bud. Just because we're trying for humour here, doesn't mean we're taking the bus straight to Memesville.

[b]REJECTED.[/b]

[@Protoman]

Fuck yeah, that's the kinda thing I wanna see.

[b]APPROVED.[/B]

Alright, been a long week and work's had me by the balls. 

Let's start with the CSs.

[@Weird Tales]

Err... no, bud. Just because we're trying for humour here, doesn't mean we're taking the bus straight to Memesville.

[b]REJECTED.[/b]

[@Protoman]

Fuck yeah, that's the kinda thing I wanna see.

[b]APPROVED.[/B]

[@dereken]

Like the backstory. You're in.

[b]APPROVED.[/b]

[@1Hawkeyes]

>Buys gadgets off of Ebay.

Checks out, you're in.

[b]APPROVED.[/b]

[@Keksalot]

Angry fire-spouting Dolph Lundgren? You bet your ass you're...

[b]APPROVED.[/B]

[@Ashevelendar]

Hmm... imagination projection, eh? This might need some consideration.

I see you've already put limits on it, which I'm pretty happy about, but for the sake of anyone else's gripes how 'bout we say the effects of those limitations become more severe depending on the complexity of the item? 

Sounds reasonable that a solid object would be easier to project than a mechanically-complex device full of wires and moving parts, right?

[b]PENDING.[/b] (Though I kinda like it so far.)