[quote=@Mistiel] On the contrary, alt right people don't need a set definition for everything. They appeal to logic instead, and LOGIC and common sense dictate what they know to be true at any given time. When the [u][i][b]facts[/b][/i][/u] change, so do their opinions that they formulated based on that information. Make sense? Also, the "alt right" is just that: alternative conservatism. It just means they don't agree with EVERY facet of conservatism. They might have some liberal ideas. They might take a page out of the libertarian playbook (woot!). When a loose group of people is considered by society to be "alternative", it just means that they don't really fit the mold for any other group. There are alt liberals, alt libertarians, alt Greens, et cetera. [/quote] [quote=@JDolan] And why, [@Garattee], would you want to defend racist, isolationist, neo-authoritarian, disciples of Sam Huntington and his [i]Clash of Civilizations[/i] theory that want to completely unmake the post-Bretton Woods, post-UN Charter world order to fit their worldview via conspiracy-peddling? Now I'm not saying that Bretton Woods is perfect, but it is quite necessary in the modern globalized order which can't be retreated without total collapse of the worldwide economy, essentially. [/quote] See what I mean? not even 12 hours and already two very different definitions, how can this position be defended or criticized?