Being less of an asshole now - I've always made it a personal rule of thumb to never explicitly state my character is beautiful. I describe them as objectively as possible and I let the reader decide for them self. In books, we often see through the eyes of the character - if they see someone they find is beautiful, they're gonna describe them that way. But most decent narrators wouldn't objectively assert them to be so. It's forcing it and it isn't very relatable.

The personality doesn't go very in depth into who they really are as a person. People are so nuanced that it's practically impossible to reduce them to bullet points, and some of the traits contradicted each other. Some role plays would accept it, but having written with Allen for a decent 5-6 years, we've come to appreciate humanity to such a degree that anything less than a paragraph for their mannerisms, one for their virtues, and one for their flaws wouldn't be enough. Then you have all the ticks such as exceptions, rationalities, triggers, and potential avenues their dispositions may take if a particular prerequisite is met, but those are usually "above and beyond" options that we would allow players to expand upon if they so chose. Not a requirement, as that can be explored in character if it's difficult to explore them.

The rest of us don't need to know your goals or history. The GMs do. It's how we keep each other from bullshitting or metagsming or pulling shit out of our asses and thumbtacking skills or events that don't make sense. Which, speaking of, skills weren't mentioned. That's all.