[quote=@Etcetera] Already expressed concern for this one. They don't exist. And even if they did, it takes a world of extra knowledge to hack into them—coding is as far from hacking as boating is to swimming. And I already mentioned that rogue hackers would have a tough time with the systems if they even wanted to get in. Terrorists are inbred inbeciles, so I think we're okay. Why hack a car when you can shoot a gun? Assassins have other ways of killing people unless they work for a government entity, which was already mentioned. And it doesn't help that the govt. can already remotely shut down vehicles—I doubt that it'll be any more of an issue than it currently is, especially given how conspicuous it would be. [/quote] Dude you're taking cyber security classes. You should be fully aware that security is always just barely one step ahead of hackers at the best of times. People have remotely hacked fucking drones, and you think that they won't be able to hack a car? Something that can't really have updates very often? Not to even mention that every car company would have their own security system, and wouldn't be using a standard program, meaning traffic wouldn't even really be fixed because there wouldn't be a unified control system. AND equipping cars with with as much sensory equipment as would be necessary would cost unimaginable amounts of money. Why hack a car when you can shoot a gun? Because a car is incredibly more dangerous, and if you can hack one car you can hack 100. Hell, if you gave me a single car drone I could kill and maim more people than you could with a completely silent sniper rifle and perfect cover for 48 hours. How conspicuous it would be? Have you never heard of Princess Dianna? Hacking a car to kill someone is the easiest to explain away thing in the world. "Oh there was X car trouble that the driver wasn't aware of." "Oh there was a freak accident on an icy road." Etc.