[quote=@mdk] With precious few exceptions, yes, anyone and everyone can. Well that's part of the dream, innit? There is no "peak." We just keep building. So it's, what, "unrealistically achievable" in your estimation? I'm doing it right now. [/quote] Becoming Steve Jobs level rich. [quote=@SleepingSilence] [@Andreyich] Again how would restrictions like that even work? Like how about the restriction that any business that gets over 50 employees (part/full doesn't matter) needs to provide health insurance. That's a restriction that stunts growth, how would YOU make that rule justifiable? Add a 0? Add two? Then ask yourself Why on earth would anyone hire that many people? Restrictions only hurt small businesses. Try to purposefully screw the bigger ones, and they'll move somewhere that won't. People seem to assume ones with no power can try to bully those that worked for a living and took a risk, they'll leave and you'll only make everyone worse off as a result. We have one of the highest corporate tax rates... Like [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ]eating the rich[/url], and [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj7nRc3_EG0]bar stool economics[/url] should have taught by now. Making the rich "pay", for being wealthy. Is just greed and it doesn't lead to any actual positive results. [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS_fsuDVglE[/youtube] [/quote] No they don't. There's also lot's of hyperbole on your part, I'm not a fucking commie or some retard like Corbyn/Bernie I'm not asking for anything monumental. Anyway, most of my wishes for restrictions are ethic/moral ones, environmental and to do with outsourcing or "insourcing," especially if the outsourcing/"insourcing" involves one or two of the earlier mentioned things I want restrictions upon. Your videos linked aren't pertinent to me and anyway are full of hyperbole even if they do make red fucks stop and think about just stupid their position is.