[quote=@Andreyich] I have high tolerance and only drank beer, not the homemade stuff we had in the old country that we'd put in a car sometimes. [/quote] Yea...most people that tell me that get drunk quicker. Because they end up drinking more than they can tolerate. XP [quote] Sorry to be blunt but that the hell does this mean? [/quote] In layman's term, the "democrat" party, who run cities continuously without any other party getting a chance. Has lead to the worst living conditions and cities, which lead to those cities to become susceptible to crime. Detroit for instance, had one of the highest city per capita of every city of the U.S, is now in ruins from this. [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weqQR-NnnIs[/youtube] [quote] I don't know dude America seemed pretty racist and you hear stories of raycis people in America all the time but if you're an American I'll take your word for it. [/quote] Google and many american run businesses have gender and race quota's to make sure their's enough "diversity" within a business. You know how those quota's are in Japan? They DON'T HAVE THEM, because they don't give a damn. You hear it because the media outside is spreading even worse propaganda out there... [quote] It is unintentionally, because culture is not the only difference. [/quote] Neither is race? It's not racist. It's literally about opposing criminals. You can have a problem with a person or group and not care about the characteristics. [quote] Very poor analogy, since that was after all 80 years ago and it's an argument based on "muh exceptions" which I instantly discount. Rich blacks also tend to commit as much or equivalent crime to poor whites. [/quote] I know, I said it was. But so was the link you provided. Individuals shouldn't matter and even if they did, it wasn't a good one to provide. Most (and I mean nearly all) "crimes" rich blacks get punished for though related to drug possession. Which can be debated if that's a worthy crime or not. [quote] He's much less likely to do so, not to mention poor whites don't fall into that culture as much as poor blacks. [/quote] There's a fault in your own logic. You used the word "thug"...that already implies the fucker ain't on the up and up. It would be like using the word "rapist" implying men and telling me it less likely to happen because that rapist is a women. But the word you used was already a negative connotation. So how does that really make any logical sense? Poverty is still a large factor of crime. I'd argue more so than race. In almost all cases of various crimes. https://www.secureteen.com/juvenile-delinquency/poverty-key-factor-contributing-to-high-juvenile-delinquency-rates/ https://vittana.org/26-poverty-and-crime-statistics People living in households in the US that have an income level below the Federal poverty threshold have more than double the rates of violent victimization compared to individuals in high-income households. Individuals who live in poverty are more likely to report a crime than those who do not live in poverty, but more than half of all crime is believed to go unreported to local law enforcement. When people live in households that are struggling with poverty, they also have a higher rate of violence that involves a firearm at 3.5 per 1,000 people compared to 0.8-2.5 per 1,000 people in middle-to-high income families. For both whites and blacks/African-Americans in the US, the overall pattern of being in poverty with the highest rates of victimization was consistent. For Hispanics and Latinos, violent victimization is relatively equal across all income levels. Hispanics in the US who are living in poverty have nearly half the rates of violent victimization when compared to poor whites. Even poor blacks/African-Americans have a lower rate of violent victimization in poverty compared to whites. Urban poverty increased the risks of violence and crime for US households, but did not change the racial risk factors. Whites are the most at risk in an urban poverty household to experience crime, at a rate of 5.64%. Blacks/African-Americans had the second highest level of risk for experiencing crime in urban poverty at 5.13%. [quote] No, I acknowledge what is due acknowledgement. I do think that the break up of family structure thus leading to unemployment and a nasty circle is very detrimental. However, long ago, in ye olden days before words were even created, the white lad had to care for a family to help them survive the cold, they had to swim, and build shelter much more often, for this was the best way to pass on his DNA. For the African lads, the best way to pass on their DNA was to simply have as many partners as possible and beat the competition away. This, by natural selection and all created two groups of people with traits physical, behavioural and emotional that are very different, so while society can largely be blamed it isn't the [i]sole[/i] thing to be blamed. [/quote] Now I'm not sure where you get this from exactly... [quote] Yes they most definitely do. I do generalize although I find stereotypes to be often silly, i.e. Asians being bad at driving; they are most likely on average about as good at driving as whites because of higher IQ and thus pattern recognition and spatial awareness, whilst blacks loving their watermelons more than their mothers is also very silly since watermelons grow best in far north africa and the middle east and naturally wouldn't be part of their preferred/customary palette. Superiority is theoretically and in practice impossible, simply adaptations for different ways to lead of life is what happens. Blacks are faster than whites, whites are stronger than blacks, blacks are much better adapted for jumping whilst whites are better adapted for swimming. Yes, I admit that environs do heavily affect perspective. [/quote] Well again, you say definitely but it's to be debated by people still to this day. :/ I feel like generalizations aren't practical on a pure logical standpoint and the more people that think in those ways, take one step towards suggesting shit like eugenics. Not saying you in anyway. But admitting your "racist" and just being aware of differences between bodies and cultures etc. aren't the same... Racism is prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race (or someone else race) is superior. [quote] I mean, I'm not. I don't assume that every single black out there is going to be some fried chicken munching serial rapist, I just think recognition of differences between various ethnic groups is healthy, and that has helped me in the real world. [/quote] I sort of doubt it. (the help of being prejudiced) Though I guess people perceive things differently all around. But you call yourself a racist, without a hint of hesitation? I feel like the only reason to do that is to be provocative... It's like people on youtube, young blokes in their 20's starting to outright post sympathizing remarks to pedophiles. It's just a little worrying that people like that don't seem to even be aware of why that's a problem in the first place. Not to get off in the weeds, but I assume you're an atheist? (Just curious.)