I'm not in favour of [i]any[/i] 4th wall-breaking heroes because few people do it well. I agree with [@Caits] that the toon character shouldn't have it, because it's silly, but I'm also uncomfortable because the objection seems to be in the name of making sure the Co-GM's Deadpool child is unique and special in the roleplay as the only one with the meta knowledge. Someone could make a child of She-Hulk and justify that power's placement – movies are not the be and end all of the comic book world. I feel like if it's banned for one person, it should be banned for everyone (including GMs) in the name of fairness, because right now it's quite alienating to see two different sets of rules for different people.

I don't know. I'm also worried that more arguments are going to develop, as we've already seen in the telepathy debacle, and also I think that the characters [i]without[/i] the backing of a canonical parent (or two) are being placed at a disadvantage, because they don't have the 'lore' to back up huge lists of powers. People who have the creativity to create their own OC and put them in the roleplay shouldn't be shunted away as side-characters, and it certainly feels like that now.

Isn't there a rule somewhere that says all of the students are low-powered to begin with to allow room to grow?