[quote=@Penny]
There isn't much you can do that people who reject the broad consensus of the scientific community. It is a lost cause, you might as well have some fun. 
[/quote]

Not sure who this is meant for, if anyone. But science just doesn't work that way. I really hope people understand this, that broad consensus isn't how they operate...

http://scienceisneversettled.com/consensus-is-not-science/

The late Michael Crichton, MD, author, film producer, put it this way:
“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.