[@POOHEAD189]

They do not exclusively prove your point, not at all actually. In the context of what [@mdk] said, they are pretty true to the angle he was advocating. No less, I purposefully mentioned Google and discredited it because I went right to several sources of varying leanings to get the answers. Google is an [i]excellent[/i] tool to search the internet with and learn by its results, but a very poor source in itself as with Wikipedia. They do not tell the entire truth or the contextual truth, which to some lengths is their own fault and others just the practicality or reality of the situation.

Point being, you cannot issue an "Ah-ha!" as with [i]"No, it's more like that's some dictionary bullshit, cuz it's the legit definition."[/i] because if you take everything literally as is and out of context, without accounting for the other components involved, more so out of character for the person speaking, there's no real reason to even hold a discussion. If we devolved to that in a topic as diverse as nationalism and what people are talking about in it then we are all going to be talking about different things. Again, the particular brand of what we are discussing is not that. I am [i]fairly[/i] certain there's no actual jingoist or narrow nationalism at hand.

The purpose of linking the results of the dictionary searches was to prove that is not the exclusive use of nationalism. It might be how people are starting to use it, certainly, as well how they do [i]now[/i] with patriotism as a whole, but that does not make it unerringly accurate.