[quote=@Andreyich]
[@mdk]
Trump friendly groups I meant. 
[/quote]

And this, in your mind, constitutes "hacking the US election?"

Before you answer -- Clinton staffers wrote (in "Shattered," their book recounting the campaign process and the post-election fallout) that she and Podesta invented the Russia story altogether. [url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/19/politics/election-day-russia-hacking-explained/index.html]Here's CNN's assessment of things[/url], before they knew they lost. [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cruh2p_Wh_4]Here's Obama laughing about the very concept of an election being hacked,[/url] and note my personal favorite part, where he talks about what he and Clinton ought to do if Trump wins (lol). [url=https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/elections/100000004723988/clinton-calls-trump-threat-to-democracy.html]Here's Hilary saying shut up about election rigging, and talking about respecting the results of the election[/url] -- she didn't know yet that she lost, so that explains why she can smugly call anyone who questions the outcome of the election a "threat to democracy."

I can show you what the rest of the DNC was saying about it too, but I'm on the clock here.... The point is, what I'm demonstrating here is, [i]by their own admission, none of it ever happened, none of it was ever possible, and to even suggest such a thing would cause chaos and [b]that very same chaos[/b] was the only real threat in the whole scenario.[/i] Then they lost so they said "Fuck it, the chaos won't hurt us as much as the truth, let's go with Russia hacking." [i]And you're swallowing it.[/i] Don't.