[@The Valkyrie] For a guy whose sole purpose had been shaping a country that shared his visions and would carry them on even after his death, he would have to be an incompetent retard to not have taken every measure to weed out any danger that came to that plan. Especially those dangers that came from within. I mean is it that far fetched that you have [b]that[/b] level of control over your country and people to not get any revolutions and uprisings?

How do revolutions work anyway? There is always someone who decides that things aren't the way they are supposed to be and tries to convince others to join him. The worst things are the higher the chances of gathering a big crowd. But how bad are things when the only problem the people have is harsh working conditions? Are they that selfish to risk their families just because they got tired [b]working[/b]?