[@Keyguyperson]

Firstly, the constitution is more of a law of the land, and was only really used in the argument as an explanation why undesirable people have the right to speak, as those writing the constitution had their reasons why which are very similar to mine.
Being that the constitution is the law of the land, the atheist does not have to follow the Bible, they sure as hell have to follow the law whether they like it or not.