[quote=@Hank] This is why, [@Odin]. If they want to return they can make the effort themselves. [/quote] I cannot help but wonder why you made this a rule or protocol but didn't ban people talking about advocating the literal murder of everyone of a certain religion. I'm not one to get touchy about these subjects but the arbitrary nature of the [i]application[/i] of the rules is more than clear to me. I don't care what he said and I don't want Sven to get banned, mostly because he doesn't use the site anyway ([i]hey, where did we hear that before, ho right, neither J8 nor Nyt used the site anyway therefore they weren't a loss anyway[/i]). But it's striking how you decided to handle this argument. 'We don't discuss bans with others' yet Nyt and J8's names have been linked to my own a few times for no reason other than I am friends with them (or in the case of Nyt, we didn't even really get along that well at first to begin with). So why is it that you can link users together but then do not allow them to speak together? Why is it 'Odin and his friends' when talking about us but not when talking to us? That whole issue aside, I'm just curious to what your logic is when you are defending someone that said in your own [i]official ([b]official!!!!!!)[/b][/i] RPG discord that he wants all muslims to die, but then refuse to do so or even hear an argument in favour of two people who in comparison have said things that were only tame to begin with. Aria told us that it was because 'Sven was free to say and think what he likes to think, because we do not control thoughts' or something along that line. I assume that represents the opinions of the mod team. Then I assume that that also goes for both J8cob and Nyt. This was evidently not the case as they were both banned for saying what they thought. Keep me banned. Honestly, nothing of value was lost anyway. But Nyt and J8 didn't deserve what they got.