[quote=@Inkarnate] This is pretty much the definition of false equivalence. I sent screenshots of a “private community” that was effectively conspiring to get Ruby removed from her place as moderator because of past transgressions and personal squabbles. Which by the way, I sent these images to the [i]Site Administrator[/i] that a [i]dangerous precedent[/i] was beginning to unfold that I personally found problematic despite being friendly acquaintances with the core group at the time. I never aired these images “publicly” and told Mahz specifically that I quote: [sub][b]“It seems there is a particularly vocal sub-sect of the unofficial discord server that are confused, angry, and disappointed. I’m not sure how to report things in this manner since I don’t want to waste your time – I’m sure Cynder is expressing her concerns. With that said, I wish you the best in this situation.”[/b][/sub] It is only comparable if you take things at face value alone. But I do appreciate you trying to sow more dissent, Nyt. [/quote] "sowing dissent" Must be why the United States is destroyed, seeing how much criticism ther- wait. Please. Criticism isn't going sow much dissent. I've already addressed this so I don't see why you keep making this point. I mean, if you look at the screens that were given, Nutts was pretty vocal about how he wanted me gone because I was "toxic" and "lustful for power". Could you not argue that the taker of that screenshot was worried about the "dangerous precedent" this was setting? It suggested that he was going to shadowban anyone who weren't positive.