[@Kangaroo] I'm sorry, but I feel like there's no room for compromise here. Not with my personal situation. Honestly I don't have any investment for the other parts of the conversation, except for Nyte's and Cynder's treatment, but where I stand there is no reasonable leeway. I broke no rules. I did nothing wrong. I have no reason to apologize for anything until Mahz proves to me that he's not as bad as I think he is, in which case my only obligation to apologize would be because I'd then feel guilty for insulting him. As it stands now I have no incentive to apologize to anybody in this thread or on this site. Other topics discussed so far have room for compromise but not this one. Your understanding of the situation is limited due to not being there but I can assure you that my only mistake was thinking that Mahz would follow his own rules. If there was any defense for Mahz's actions against me it would've been made by now. Even the rest of the staff agreed that he was overly emotional and not in the right state of mind. So I'm not going to compromise. He is.

[@TheTwistedOne] Not gonna apologize either.

[@Inkarnate] There is no inverse here. I am not in the wrong. Supposing there is a possibility that I might be wrong for the sake of equal measure to words is critically flawed. I can be wrong on subjects, I'm not infallible. But to suggest I'm in the wrong here is a demonstration of ignorance to the topic at hand. The question becomes if its willful or benign and with you I'm not sure.