[@Lady Amalthea] The bans people were vocally against were initiated by Mahz, as far as I am aware. So the prospect of these community arbiters/justices/etc would answer to Mahz which people are in opposition against at this moment. It seems like it would do nothing but create more division, bureaucracy, and make the site inefficient as a byproduct.

At the end of the day this is Mahz's [i]sole-propeitorship[/i] and he does not have to listen less alone compromise. Of course just writing off the community would have its [negative] effects, but I think people are reading too much into how [i]they[/i] would run the site and [i]want[/i] to run it rather than the relative same system Mahz has run for over a decade that is janitorial at its core and simple in its design. Roleplayerguild is not a [i]democracy.[/i] The only suggestion I can make is for the staff to refine their rules to make distinct lines of right and wrong so the forum can run efficiently with little error.