[quote=@RWBY Spectre] No, it does not. It was completely separate paragraph, in the conclusion of the text and, as I said, it meantions what happens every so often to bad leaders throught the course of history. That paragraph doesn't have Mahz name on it for a reason. It's the conclusion of the historic argument. It's just a matter of reading that with a slightly educated and mature mind to perceive it. I'm not calling you not educated, by the way. In fact, I'm glad that you have pointed what was the misunderstood bit. But again, take it by face value, just as it's written and meant to be taken, and this issue disappears. [/quote] The context was in the post at large, and it seems to me that it's easily understood as being a reference directly to Mahz. Some would assume different, but presumably, that's where Hank also based his writings on the 'overthrow' case. The explained context isn't necessarily bad, but a better split likely could have been made. That said, with that explanation of context, it sounds alright to me now, not involving myself in other portions of this discussion.