I am not sure how that sounded like a reasonable or rational response to a non-existent issue. The man's name is Robert Lee, which is but only, and at the same time, entirely his name. There is no mistaking him for [i]Robert E. Lee[/i] a Confederate general who died near one-hundred-fifty years ago. If someone takes offense at that coincidence, I would almost dare say they deserve to be offended. I had heard about the meaningless gesture to avoid "controversy", but I had hoped it wasn't true. Color me none surprised that it is reality at this point.