[@TheWindel][@KoL]
[quote=@Lonewolf685]
Not really. It's a fundamental aspect, like fire being a high temperature. It's more a wasted effort, playing to your weakness rather then a strength. But I should really re-iterate that these are only minor advantages and this line of inquiry has me thinking you're trying to develop someone seeking to exploit this when that's really not a wise idea.
[/quote]

Not "seeking to exploit", just pondering if it's possible. Though since you mention it, I could give my character a weapon that was originally developed with that purpose in mind, only for it to fail in that regard for all manner of reasons. It might be an interesting point to examine, at least.

[quote]Nope, there is no fall back point.[/quote]

Now that does strike me as a touch odd. You'd think that'd be kind of important strategically speaking, but if the cities are practically impregnable anyway, I guess it doesn't matter so much.

[quote]Juno has two bodies. The human shaped one people interact with, and a massive serpent who is coiled around the entire Nexus and holds it together. People got to glimpse that a few battles ago. As Windel had said the Vassals were never intended to be as prevalent as they had been so most others aren't as relevant.[/quote]

Ooh, interesting. I suppose more information won't be forthcoming for a while, then. Alas.

[quote]Your inclination determines the color eye you receive; As in a more violent and destructive person get's Gold while a more supportive or commanding person gets Silver. As for stealing them? Can't say.[/quote] 

Sounds about right.

[quote]As I said before, plans have been FUBARed so often we literally can not say any more on the Great Danger.[/quote]

Alright, well, thank you for saying as much as you can anyway.

[quote]Though all of these questions are superfluous at the moment, as one has to wonder what bearing they have on your character sheet. Capital Raiding, Colored Eyes, Vassals and Capital Raiding are really irrelevant subjects for a new character. Questions are nice and all but when you have no investment in the RP it's just raising concerns as to what kind of character you have brewing.
[/quote]

I'll be honest, that seems like a fairly uninviting attitude to have. Like Silvan said, they're interesting topics from a scholarly point of view, rather than specifically how they're relevant IC; on that note, discussing them OOC doesn't by any means negate the possibility of characters discovering something about them IC, and in fact could spur players to drive their characters in that direction.

[quote]But anywho, I'm fine if BC has more questions, but really like a status update as to his CS.[/quote]

He's very nearly done. At this point, it's basically just figuring out whether I've missed anything significant or not, maybe adding in the thing I suggested above. Don't worry, he should be ready very soon.