I was not speaking to that article, [@Dynamo Frokane]. As I have reiterated, what little I saw or knew of him was previously described, and that itself was already limited - the attack certainly being more famous than anything else. As of recently I have seen nothing come up about him. 

I am going off of the opinion that more or less getting him to admit it in person would be much more damaging than what he is going to write in terms of perception. If they wanted to actually make him out to be just as he wrote, it would have been best to approach him that way. Again, all I have seen about it was the screeching about how they "Found one." and immediately ignored it because it has no relevance to me or my affiliation. No less, they have cried wolf so many times, consider me disinterested to hear "X was outed as being a Y because of [i]insert popular reason of the week.[/i]"