I've started to feel guilty we/I took a quaint thread and turned it into TL'DR zone so I'll reply this way and probably just leave it at that after this. (Damn conscience)

Point 1: Agreed it's not a very deep game. Though I'd say there are aspects you still need to learn. I spent a few Playthroughs as an Argonian Ranger or Warrior and it wasn't until my 3rd playthrough I even used a Soulgem so I figured those out on my own lol. 

Point 2: I think my quote above your point disproved your follow up. But agree to disagree there. 

Point 3: Yup, Halo is not an RPG and those are relatively ok suggestions for Halo. 

Point 4: Every game isn't judged on the same merits, yes. But I feel like you can use your logic on a lot of things to make it sound bad regardless. And while you went into Skyrim with rose colored glasses, I don't see how you can go from that to this unless you yourself changed as a person on how you look at games fundamentally.

Point 5: Yup, agreed. Skyrim has flaws and like I said, it's our outlooks on the game that makes it worthwhile or not worthwhile to play it. 

Point 6: Oh, well Bethesda better get on that shiet. 

No Man's Sky: I've had some friends play it but I can see that from the reviews. Also I kinda think DA: I did worse than Skyrim on most things, now that you mentioned it. I was literally thinking of it the entire time I was talking/thinking about there being games with more static dialogue and worse learning curves. 
[@Fabricant451]