We have come to the place where it is somehow considered reasonable to make such an argument at all and in any light other than grim humor. There is a stark contrast between killing and murder, but this? This is the advocation, or at very least the norming and conditioning to, the murder of children, unquestionably so at that.

I might not agree with the "choice" philosophy, but I admit they have [i]some[/i] points. This concept is off the rails for a "choice" argument if it was to be anything other than parody. Consider me skeptical if they say they were just posing this in hypothetical thought and vacuum; I haven't even that much trust in me to believe them.