As is the price of having children, [@Penny]. For the record, this is not a moral argument either I am making, just a logical one. If one is willing or able to have a child, intentionally or inadvertently, there is a level of risk and responsibility they accept as a parent. This is the same concept as that when one decides to drive, they willingly accept that they might die in a vehicle accident of their own doing or another's, right or wrong. They must furthermore recognize and stand for the fact that just as the child does not choose their parents, or their ability or disability if any, they do not choose the child either. So if you wish to hand the executioner's blade over to one, rather than attempt - even to failure - to make impossible scenarios work, there should not be sympathy for the parenting party either.

No less, I hold the impression that average person cannot be trusted with what is or is not "suffering" when this topic is brought about no less, given that abortion has become less about what is good for the child and more about what is good for the parent; too easy is it for them to find a way around the intent. A doctor, while they might adhere to these standards in a number of cases, can be compromised as well without extensive oversight. History has proven that with enough business, money and traffic involved, there are hands willing to be waived.

I would rather shoulder the burden on the parents who made the decision at all.