[quote=@Odin] The question is whether we want criteria to be enforced at all. I personally prefer not, and letting people use their common sense as a guiding tool. But that would be easier if the current descriptors weren't so vague. As mentioned before, a single RP can apparently fit criteria for all the sections (allegedly because I honestly doubt it can) and thus that signals that the descriptions are poor.[/quote] The current descriptions aren't vague. Some people just choose to deliberately misinterpret them, either because of their aforementioned inferiority complexes or because they don't like the personalities/writing ability/low expectations of the people that apply for their roleplays if they are posted in the Free section. The logical response to this isn't to bump the roleplay up to Casual (or—god forbid—Advanced), but to tell the people who apply for their one-liner RPs and who are not the type of roleplayer they are looking for to go find another RP to join. It is totally theoretically possible to have a really high concept roleplay with IC posts that don't quite break the 100 character count, but that doesn't magically transmogrify it into a Casual RP.