[quote=@Kratesis] [@POOHEAD189] I am finding some of your statements so vague that it is hard for me to understand precisely what you want to communicate to me. So what you are saying, if I am understanding you correctly, is that making your children attractive isn't always good because there is an element of chance to life. They -could- end up immature. They -could- end up with a bad character. They -could- end up in a field where they -might- be discriminated against for their appearance. That is like saying that leveling up in D&D isn't, how did you put it.. 'inherently good'.. because you could still roll a low number on your dice. [i]So what if you get +5 attack! You have a 50% chance to roll a 10 or less![/i] Obviously this is a non sequitur. [/quote] I just revealed to you that studies are inconclusive on whether or not good looks = advancement, so no that is not a correct analogy. I could just as easily say [i]So what you are saying, if I am understanding you correctly, is that making your children unattractive isn't always good because there is an element of chance to life. They -could- end up immature. They -could- end up with a bad character. They -could- end up in a field where they -might- be discriminated against for their appearance.[/i] Just change the word of attractive to unattractive, and there's the same amount of chance for all of that studies show. Attractiveness does not increase your value as a human being.