[quote=@mdk]
Absolutely not. The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is inalienable. It is imperative. It is the absolute cornerstone of the United States and it extends to disabled people.
[/quote]They have the right to live, doesn't mean the tax payers have to fund that life.
They have the right to liberty, doesn't mean the tax payers have to fund that liberty.
They have the right to pursuit of happiness, doesn't mean the tax payers have to fund that pursuit of happiness.

You have the right but you have to pay for it yourself. Otherwise where does the false entitlement end?

[quote=@Dark Wind]
<Snipped quote by mdk>

I'm not sure that Kitty meant what they said in this fashion. My interpretation (and Kitty can correct me if I'm wrong) is that they meant poor or disabled citizens should not have more rights than anyone else. She/he seems to be of the position that taxes sent to public welfare are not required because they aren't necessarily going to materials that the welfare receivers need but instead go to luxuries they couldn't afford on their own. 

EDIT: And that this includes healthcare within the non-consensual use of their tax dollars.[/quote]I don't care how people spend their money as long as they spending their money not tax payer money. Tax payer money should never go to an individual or business* ever. Tax payer money should only go to things that benefit everyone, i.e. parks, roads, bridges, defense, other infrastructure.

*If a business or person sells their goods or services to a government department it is for them to get tax payer money.

[quote=@Andreyich]
Ah I think I see, people are going to intentionally start whacking their spines so they can't work and get that sweet sweet disability money.[/quote]I have seen it. Not to that extreme, I have a good for nothing cousin who is on disability because he intentionally hurt himself. He gets less now than when he worked but he should be working for that money not setting on his fat ass playing video games.