Fundamentally, as someone who these days looks more towards the PM system than any forum interaction - yes, some adjustments would be nice. However, I don't think the core should shift very much. I do agree with the change in language for forum names; it seems more semantically correct to me, and really, all that would functionally change would be the name and the description. Not necessarily the threads that go into the sections. Heck, you could keep the old tags.

Moderation, that said, I do not consider an issue. As a site user who's talked with a small core of other site users, the "average experience" as I've seen it is simply that the mods are irrelevant. Yes. Irrelevant until called upon. GMs handle issues for themselves. What problems do pop up I've had settled quickly by former and current mods. I don't see anything wrong with the system, so I can't agree that there's some dramatic change needed. 

[quote]Moderators appear uncommitted and seem 'okay' with how things are now even if the community disagrees and has stated they are not satisfied.[/quote]

Who is "the community"? Who stands for them? Who has properly collected the views of what is referenced as the "community" in any of the posts of this nature? I consider myself a member and wasn't asked about it to form that base.

I think the discord is poorly set out and doesn't have a very good cluster of folks in a big chunk of its community, so I don't really care what goes on there. I won't comment on suggestions for it. Other issues seem frivolous and dependent on the community at large having an opinion on the matter.