[quote=@POOHEAD189]
While I did vote for Hillary, I don't like her, and I am not a supporter of hers. I voted for her because I was against a corrupt television personality with a penchant for sexual offense being given executive power. Hillary is definitely shady, but I still trusted her with nuclear launch codes. 

In essence, just because I am anti-Trump doesn't mean I am arguing for Hillary Clinton. I felt like this was a particularly weak election.
[/quote]

Corrupt is the operative word here, and in essence, once again, a subjective descriptor for Trump.

Some people think Trump corrupt, others do not. Some people think Hillary corrupt, others do not.

I'm against any candidate who calls close to half of the country 'deplorable'. I'm against any candidate who has a strong inclination toward gun control. Universal healthcare appears to me, on paper, reckless and economically irresponsible even if it 'sounds' nice. My home state is a good example of this: Romney's health care reform has gone out of control with spending, and I see the same trends in other countries who have adopted this policy. The Hillary emails, the DNC emails, they all suggest strong leanings toward corruption. A lot of this was poorly planned, right down to the slogan. "I'm with her." vs "Make America Great Again." It shouldn't be too difficult to recognize the superior slogan. One is about Hillary, and one is about America. Hillary's slogan suggests that she should be president because she's a woman. Women should vote for Hillary because they're women. Didn't she just say recently that she believed women who voted for Trump are 'publicly disrespecting themselves'? It's hard to fathom (for me) that amount of arrogance, condescension, and point blank repugnantly sexist behavior. Women are not monoliths. Women have agency and individual minds just like everyone else.

But again, this argument comes down to, in perhaps too much simplicity: is Trump corrupt or is Hillary corrupt? Is Trump good or is Hillary good? Or, even, the lesser evil debate. We're obviously of two different minds on this, and our perspectives are subjective although we try to provide our positions with the strength of attempted objective analysis.