I will take it then that the "Judicial Watch" and "Politico" sources are no longer good enough, neither is a commission dedicated to rooting out the voting fraud of the last Presidential election. This to me just appears to be denial, as the difference of approximately one-point-five million American voters is [i]very[/i] close for a popularity contest, [i]especially[/i] for one where a career politician with tremendous power like Hillary Clinton is taking on the would-be underdog and "every label you can throw at him" Donald Trump. The argument of "many misinformed people" falls apart very quickly when you break that down into even basic statistics and throw out the likelihood, evidence, and fact there was voting fraud.

As for sore about anything, there's [url=https://i.redd.it/vlrd19djspqy.png]this[/url], which has not and never will age well. As an addition, here's [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZHp4JLWjNw&app=desktop]this[/url] moment, which will live in infamy. For voters, this was not an issue of being "uninformed".