Yes, they confirmed their own reporting, which is not unexpected in the slightest. They made a claim and are choosing to dedicate to it, to which I might add is almost assuredly a losing battle. On a tangent however, I severely doubt this was an act of the media to "know the standards of what is presidential", so to speak. If there is a group of people that haven't any idea what that is, that is the mainstream media, who have been so downgraded that some of them are now seated in the back rows of the foreign press section; that is the level of incompetence and lack of credibility they have shelved and resigned themselves to. This is utterly ignoring that the backing person in question is a known enemy of the President of the United States and his administration, which creates a bit of conflict of interest, but the short can be summed up with this:

[quote=Representative Wilson]"I'm not the only person that was in the car, and I have proof, too. This man is a sick man," she said. "I have no reason to lie on the president of the United States with a dead soldier in my community."[/quote]
Which is competing with this:

[quote]Later Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said there were no recordings of the call, but explained that Trump's "proof" amounted to there having been "several people in the room from the administration that were on the call, including Chief of Staff John Kelly."[/quote]
By quality of claim alone, and that if it were to be hypothetically investigated, the statements of those in the office with President Trump are likely to be of greater magnitude and credibility, let alone number. I am going to err on the previously demonstrated examples and contrary claims by others that this is nothing more than a swipe at the President using a proxy - the widow - in order to distract from the fact that [url=https://i.redd.it/xoav38boslsz.png]bigger things[/url] are bubbling up from the depths of the swamp.