Dunno what's up with that, [@POOHEAD189]. It [i]sounds like[/i], from [url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/22/climate/epa-scientists.html]NYT[/url], this applies only to EPA scientists, and only concerns the press -- which doesn't upset me, I guess, because [b]government science[/b] is (for me) in the same ballpark as State Priests, at least when it comes to some elements of climate change......... I sound like a nut, huh, water that down a little bit, it gets across the GIST of what I mean but definitely overstating it. 

Knowing nothing at all about the cancellation besides what I've read -- that sounds like it's in-bounds. Should we be funding science to look at the climate, yeah, definitely. Should we treat every press-box decision as [b]an attack on the very existence of knowledge[/b] or whatever? naw. 

[hider=oooooooooh I 'memberrrrr!][img]https://i.redd.it/d5e61pa7pntz.png[/img][/hider]