Another point and position I might note of tremendous importance is that those with major influence, potential and power have a moral obligation to wield it wisely. Specifically what this means is that, in a medium as the internet and its inescapable relationship with human nature, thus sociability, it must preserve at all possible lengths the right to represent people as freely as it can. Simply put from this, it is the inherent mantle of responsibility​ to protect the liberty of [i]all[/i] people to the maximum extent possible.

Companies as large as Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, and countless others have a unique position that has not prior existed; they largely govern, outside any actual law, the expectations and norms of culture as a whole. They quite literally shape the face of how people interact, react, behave and speak. Because of this, they should reasonably need bear the weight of this understanding. Which, I worryingly note, they in fact [i]do.[/i] This exact mechanism when placed into reverse with all gears turning is able to do what it has done now and foster an environment of "safe spaces" and protection from "hate speech". It has become the sheltering parent who ushers their children away from anything perceived unpleasant or unagreeable, in turn coddling them and making them incomplete, infantile people who cannot function in the real world let alone the virtual one.

Anything and everything offends these people, in that it is as simple as them lodging a complaint that their feelings were hurt or they felt bullied to shutdown opposition under thin guidelines and regulations; of which are so liberal in their writing, that you could argue them from any angle to suit a need. Hence they become exploited by those in their use and those who have authority over them.

The essence of the issue is that these great factors, these companies and their policies, are hardly good or responsible stewards of their domain. They are allowing themselves to be used as tools of a movement to further their own goals and that of their useful idiots to close out opportunities to others. Such a glaring misuse of power and overt hypocrisy is obvious to some - we are not fools ourselves as we can clearly see they are playing by double standards - but the larger matter is that this sort of activity is misconduct on a level higher than just the First Amendment. This is to ignore the very concept of what the Founders of the United States had in mind, but to a greater level as a violation of concept that all people should be allowed to engage in.

Twitter might be entitled to do these things legally, mostly, but they are equally entitled to suffer vehement repercussion for it as being enemies of free speech.