Perhaps, but how many people are they realistically fooling? They are not, like their opposition, able to leverage the victim mentality, that perspective of being owed anything or, more importantly, in modern times the claim that anything tangentially related to the [i]actual[/i] Alt-Right can be of benefit to the people. This movement and concept is not populist, not even close to the social justice front or the backers of the President. The argument of subversive, quiet manipulation does not work well for a system that has ties contrary to that.

People by and large have not and will not, as a mainstream, legitimately fall for it. It sounds too risque by nature to their ears, especially with how the media has made the Far Right some unified front. In all honesty, I believe anyone liable to be swayed to that side at this point, or prior in recent times, was already headed down that way regardless. The "Trump movement" is only tangentially related, the same with the internet communities responsible for memetic warfare that helped seing the election. Their only real commonality is their enemy in socialist, communist and authoritarian leanings; the "Alt-Right" and the [i]Alt-Right[/i] are still very much at odds.

Speaking from a threat assessment perspective, white nationalists and radical right-wing extrememists do not classically or currently recruit using these methods. They have a target audience and the little overlap they do have with other groups was only magnified by the spread of their common threat. Realistically, you are more under threat of radical Islam, even without the Islamic State, and the Alt-Left. That is the most I can say to those.

As for what you had to say about Stormfront, I do not recall; I might well have ignored that page between all the bickering, [@Dynamo Frokane].