The issue with the Roy Moore story is that there [i]isn't one[/i], [@Dynamo Frokane]. Last I had heard the accuser refused to surrender the evidence, the infamous yearbook, to a third party after many critics came forward about it being an apparently obvious forgery. There's other issues as well, such as the claim the man was the district attorney in 1977, signatures being lifted from divorce papers, the ink being in different colors, the fact "he" repeats the date twice and the message of "Christmas", yearbooks coming out at Christmas, the fact the person involved has direct ties to the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign, that her story doesn't pan out, that she was offered a thousand dollars by reporters to accuse the man, so on and so forth.