[@Odin] So in the scenario that I brought up, you not being the GM, would you PM the GM to bring up the concern with someone else's character post? Or would you just assume the GM gave them the permission to break their own lore or have an undefined power. The customer is always right addage, if you will.

But you at least acknowledge that you can point out people's mistakes and flaws without being judged for it and feel justified for doing so. As long as you are the GM of the campaign [S]or just someone who isn't me? Don't worry about it. I hate me too sometimes. That's even more common ground we share.[/S]

I guess it's nice to be honest and transparent with your biases? No really, it's a step. (If I can ever meet someone to give me a concrete reason for their contempt I'd shower them with confetti.) 

So theoretically someone else could use the exact same words I use when describing possible advice and critique with writing that you've made. And you'd take it personally to innocuous depending who said it? I suppose I go by the broken clocks can be right twice a day, so if anyone had positive or negative critique to something I had written. I'd appreciate that they took the time to read it in the first place. Though I agree my thoughts can differ from the average individual. I suppose that clears up my query and also previous discussion. Bout all I can add. Was a nice chat. :3