The sad reality is those articles along with others like them are as much ammunition for their intended audience as their opponents. They are not particularly wise about galvanizing the two opposing factors against one another, rather it almost seems to be plain intent beyond just having you on their sites or purchase their magazine or paper. Repeated observation into their content and what it is they are saying betrays them; one could say the findings to be shocking, anything absurd and outlandishly stupid such as the aforementioned "white people shouldn't marry and have kids" or  that it is somehow racist for "white people to engage in marrying outside their race". 

At the very least they deserve to be criticized and dismantled in argument, just as much as the current go-to of Nazism allegations. Personally, speaking for only myself, I have nothing but distaste for both, yet why is it so difficult to gain agreement that counter-isle arguments of much the same, although mirrored, are as bad and if not worse in our day and age? It isn't as though the Fourth Reich is mechanizing right under our noses and preparing the Final-Final Solution, but it can be damnably certain we do have extremes on the other end running free, even in full public view. These magazines and news agencies that are pushing these agendas are very much aware of what it is they are doing and what it is they are saying; it is not as though they are full of rogue agents.

One might question why this matters at all, but the average consumer of information, especially news information, is not literate let alone anything close to savvy. We might all remember that a good portion of the population fell for popup advertisements of years ago or email scams, but now and today a good portion falls prey to not only fake news, but too its cousin in agenda news. There is plenty of rational explanation for how we arrived here, you can see that reflection from the Millennial who hasn't experience really any legitimate hardship in life to the old vanguard of the fallen institutions and remnants of the Boomers, but that under no circumstance means we need accept or normalize this process of saying "Everything is racist! Even trying to not be racist is racism because if you weren't racist you wouldn't need to say you weren't racist!" through the media.

It should act as a foil to bring focus to, that something is just not right in what it is they are saying, but breaking people out of that illusion - that naive trust in going with what sounds good - is no small task. Fortunately there is some light in all of this, that there is an ever increasing revolt against such publications; they are not just being called out and criticized, but being hit in their purses. I would not shed a tear if any of them dove and closed their doors.